Came across this and thought the sport analogy was quite interesting.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Full EpisodeFor those confused about the kid at the end:
Harrison was a nine year old kid who frequently played video-games such as COD and other first person shooters. Penn and Teller argued that evidence suggesting that violent video-games made otherwise non-violent children turn aggressive was unsound and inaccurate. Harrison (along with his mother, who consented of course) was invited to a firing range where he was given a brief lesson on how to operate a rifle before being given the opportunity to fire it himself. He was given three shots at a target with a picture of a man. After he fired the first shot, he was asked if he wanted to have another - He flat out replied 'No'.
You can see how uncomfortable it made him, and really highlighted that he (and the vast majority of other children) can differentiate between fantasy and real-life violence, and how despite his enjoyment of first person shooters, he was absolutely mortified by doing it in real life.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3